Legal AI for civil-law practice

Diligence you can prove.

Constat is the practice platform for Dutch civil-law firms where verification is architecture, not a promise. A citation that has not been checked against its source cannot appear on screen. Every released advice carries a certificate. And the platform keeps watching the law after your advice goes out.

EU-sovereign
no US processor touches client data
Built for civil law
live in the Netherlands
Lawyer of record decides
nothing reaches a client unapproved

The verification gate, as the lawyer sees it

  • art. 6:265 BW — wetten.overheid.nlverified
  • ECLI:NL:HR:1981:AG4158 — rechtspraak.nlverified
  • CELEX 32011L0083 — EUR-Lexverified
  • “HR 12 mei 2019, NJ 2019/221”withheld

An unverified reference is not flagged in red. It is never rendered.

The problem

17–33%

Up to one in three answers from leading AI legal research tools cites law that does not support the claim.

That figure comes from Stanford's preregistered benchmark of commercial legal research tools. The industry's answer has been checking tools that run after generation. Constat inverts the order: verification is the gate, not the review.

SourceMagesh et al., Journal of Empirical Legal Studies (2025)

Three guarantees

We show each one live, in ninety seconds.

I

Citations cannot render unverified

Every reference is checked against its public source — Dutch legislation, case law, EU law — before it appears on screen or in an export. An unverified citation is not flagged; it is technically impossible to display.

Architecture, not a post-hoc checker.

II

A verification certificate with every advice

On release, Constat freezes the verification state and issues a certificate: every cited authority, its source, licence and good-law status at that moment, anchored to an append-only audit log.

Evidence for your client and your professional-indemnity insurer, with a plain-language cover page in the client's language.

III

The law is watched after release

Cited case law is re-checked against the citation graph after your advice ships. If an authority is later overruled or narrowed, the firm is alerted for the affected matter.

Advice that stays verified.

How each guarantee is built

How a matter runs

From client intake to monitored advice.

Walk through the platform
  1. 01

    Client intake

    A secure public form opens the file and the client books a confirmed slot from the lawyer's real availability. A limitation radar checks the dates supplied at intake against limitation and complaint-duty periods before anyone opens the matter.

  2. 02

    Consultation

    The consultation is recorded with consent captured first, producing a transcript and a grounded analysis tied to the file. The client's statements are labelled as assertions, never as findings.

  3. 03

    Verified report

    Every citation in the report is verified against its public source. Where authority cannot be verified, the platform abstains and says so rather than inventing something plausible.

  4. 04

    Drafted documents

    Notices, demand letters, memoranda and contracts are drafted from the report's verified authorities on counsel-approved templates. The same gates apply, and nothing reaches a client without lawyer approval.

  5. 05

    Release and certificate

    On release a verification certificate is issued and anchored to the audit chain. The complete dossier — documents and certificate included — exports as one bundle into the firm's own document management system.

  6. 06

    Monitoring

    After release the cited law is re-checked continuously, and the firm is alerted when an authority in a specific matter is overruled or narrowed.

Deterministic where it matters

Deadlines are computed, never guessed.

Limitation periods, complaint duties and procedural windows come from a deterministic engine, not a language model. Every rule carries a recorded sign-off by counsel of record, and every date shows its statutory basis and full derivation. Dates read from documents reach the engine only after the lawyer confirms them.

Counsel-signed rules
Auditable provenance, in code.
Limitation radar
Intake dates are checked before the file opens.
Full derivation
Every date shows the article it came from.

Sovereignty

European advice deserves European infrastructure.

Read the trust page
Processing
EU-owned, end to end
Language model
European (Mistral), zero data retention, enforced in code
US processors
None touch client or dossier data. The only non-EU service is Cloudflare's bot check on the public intake form, which sees a browser challenge and never content.
Encryption
Per-record envelope encryption, firm-held keys
Audit trail
Hash-chained, append-only
GDPR / DPIA
Completed with counsel and a DPO

See all three guarantees live.

Twenty minutes on the live platform: a citation that cannot render unverified, a certificate issued in front of you, and the monitoring that never sleeps.

Book a demo